On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 2:03 AM, Andres Perera <andre...@zoho.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 4:55 AM, Philip Guenther <guent...@gmail.com> wrote: ... >> I'm no expert on softdeps, so maybe you have a better explanation for >> why Kirk made the choice he did to have it panic in some cases? > > well, i'm no expert either. now that we have presented our > credentials, let's go back to what was already conjecture ... > do you want the kernel to figure these out after the fact and > retroactively panic() for each occurence, neatly queueing them boot > after boot or do you want to grow a pair of balls instead?
You ignore my pointer to the actual engineering and logic in this area and prefer to expand upon the conjecture. I cannot help in that area and am unwilling to have you reorder my TODO list to suit your pleasure. Instead I look forward to your diff fixing this bug in softdeps. Please send that diff to the list and not me directly, as I find your submissions uninteresting. Philip Guenther
