Hi Frank, I heard this argument that OBSD is slow circulated a little bit.
Can you please clarify and quantify? Really performance is of a very secondary importance, however unless there's a good reason for it not to be there, it is nice that it is there, hence my question for you to clarify and quantify now - Thanks, Mikael 2013/11/29 frantisek holop <min...@obiit.org> > hmm, on Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 02:00:53PM -0800, Chris Cappuccio said that > > So the next question is, why would someone want to switch to OpenBSD > > on one of these platforms? > > > > 1. Concise ecosystem (less maintenance of your own distribution) > > > > 2. High quality code > > > > 3. Increasing attention to areas that matter (ARMv7, KMS, etc) > > just like everyone else, i would love to see an openbsd > powered "android" phone. but i think the elephant in > the room no one is talking about is performance. > without getting into "running bad code faster" vs > "running good code slower", openbsd is simply slow. > > -f > -- > there's no second chance for a good first impression.
