Stuart Henderson [s...@spacehopper.org] wrote:
> On 2013-11-08, Chris Cappuccio <ch...@nmedia.net> wrote:
> > Jan Lambertz [jd.arb...@googlemail.com] wrote:
> >> http://www.areca.com.tw/support/s_openbsd/openbsd.htm
> >> Anyone tried that yet ?
> >
> > If someone can get Areca to agree to the BSD license terms, the
> > newer card support can probably be included in the OpenBSD tree.
> > That'd be nice. Maybe you could contact them?
> >
> >
> 
> License looks ok, their driver is a modified version of ours with
> the copyright notice intact.
> 
> http://www.areca.us/support/s_openbsd/driver/openbsd_V1.20.0.0_121115.zip
> 

To get to the download, you have to agree to some bullshit.

So I asked them and they are more than happy to have it included in
the tree (of course!)

Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2013 16:12:00 +0800
From: billion <billion...@areca.com.tw>
To: ch...@nmedia.net
Cc: "(?s?w????) ???M??" <ching2...@areca.com.tw>
Subject: Re: OpenBSD support

Hi Chris,

I  try to contact David Gwynne who had ported our driver on the OpenBSD.
There is no answer from him.
Yes, we are happy to release our modifications to the driver
under the original license terms so that it may be included in
future OpenBSD distributions if you can do this help for us.
I also put our engineer C.L. Huang in this loop in case he needs to do 
something.


Regards
Billion Wu


  ---------- Forwarded message ----------
  From: Chris Cappuccio <ch...@nmedia.net>
  Date: Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 6:32 PM
  Subject: OpenBSD support
  To: supp...@areca.com.tw, benjamin.ji...@areca.com.tw


  Hi
  I noticed you had newer OpenBSD support in your driver at:

  http://www.areca.com.tw/support/s_openbsd/openbsd.htm

  Would you be willing to release your modifications to the driver
  under the original license terms so that it may be included in
  future OpenBSD distributions?

  Chris


> Cleaning up the gratuitous whitespace changes, switching the c++
> style // comments to c-style, and adding the ca_activate change from
> dev/pci/arc.c r1.96 would be a good start at getting a diff that is
> reviewable..

I tried merging in the 1.95->1.96 change and it's not a simple merge.
This area was modified by Areca in interesting ways. I'm looking at it.

Chris

Reply via email to