min. 3xNICs: wan, lan, pfsync. Hmm 6xNIC == WAN 2x aggregation ports+failover+lacp, LAN 2x aggregation ports+failover+lacp and pfsync 1port = 5port use. You know, everything 4fun, btw i have 24G managed switch.
Supermicro? no way! :), ugly, audio, video,vga,hdmi, dp. No, no, no ;) On 22 paź 2013, at 01:44, noah pugsley <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 4:06 PM, emigrant <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi > > I need to replace my crappy, old machine(Master) Futro S400( http://uk.ts.fujitsu.com/rl/servicesupport/techsupport/professionalpc/thincli ents/futrosxx/futros400.htm http://cl.ly/image/3C0Z363q0M1O http://cl.ly/image/311f3U260R37 ) for something new. My Backup machine is Alix 2D3( http://cl.ly/image/2M2x1l1V0k1r ), is perfect for that(carp+pfsync, only pf and small things) :) > > Hmm, Soekris net6501-70( http://soekris.com/products/net6501.html ) or Lanner FW-7541( http://www.lannerinc.com/products/x86-network-appliances/desktop/fw-7541 ). OK, simple question, what's better?:) Price is almost the same. In my opinion Soekris is a little bit obsolete. > My requirements: small, home router/server, fanless: pf(altq+hfsc) for ~15 hosts, carp+pfsync, nat, named, www, samba, ftp, UniFi Controller(jre+mongod), pfstat, ipfm, pf logs, SSD(CF is too slow). > Hmm, Lanner looks better, 6xNIC, 1xrj45 console port, newer hardware, memory(ddr3) upgradable(i think so?), dual core Atom 64bit, all ports on front. > Soekris, maybe more professional product? > Any suggestions? > > > For not too much more $$ it looks like the Lanner is the better option. Do you really need that many nic's? You might do just as well with a cheaper supermicro box. Just a thought. > > http://www.superbiiz.com/detail.php?p=SY-117AMP > > -noah
