On 24/09/13 12:24, mxb wrote:
I'v seen this issue, but it just magically disappeared then I re-configured
ospfd and restarted on both ends.
I had an issue to see routes from area 0.0.0.0 on area 0.0.0.78.
Host A:
area 0.0.0.0 {
interface vether0 { metric 5 }
interface vether1 { metric 5 }
}
area 0.0.0.78 {
interface vether2 { metric 10
…….
}
interface carp1 { passive }
interface carp2 { passive }
interface lo1 { metric 5 }
interface vic2 { metric 10 }
}
Host B:
area 0.0.0.78 {
interface vether2 { metric 10
…….
}
}
Host A is:
OpenBSD 5.4 (GENERIC.MP) #34: Sun Jul 21 22:07:08 MDT 2013
dera...@amd64.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC.MP
Host B is:
OpenBSD 5.3 (GENERIC) #53: Tue Mar 12 18:15:44 MDT 2013
dera...@amd64.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC
As you can see, this setup works without any patch.
I tested to remove lo1 and see if routes to carped nets disappear. No luck.
Routes are there.
//mxb
On 24 sep 2013, at 11:08, Kapetanakis Giannis <bil...@edu.physics.uoc.gr> wrote:
On 24/09/13 12:02, Kapetanakis Giannis wrote:
Without this patch, routes to (lo2) and carpX:network where not distributed.
regards, G
My e-mail client somehow f@cked up Claudio's patch,
Here is the link to hist original post
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=137038436926946&w=2
G
I think I'm talking about a different setup than yours.
Cisco1 --- [area: 0.0.0.0] --- [OBSD] --- [area: 0.0.0.7]
Cisco does not learn routes from 0.0.0.7 which are only local on OBSD
(VLANs, carp, loopback etc).
If the setup is
Cisco1 --- [area: 0.0.0.0] --- [OBSD] --- [area: 0.0.0.7] --- Cisco2
Then Cisco1 learns the routes from 0.0.0.7. I guess they come from Cisco2.
G
