On 09/12/13 10:34, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 12/09/13(Thu) 08:16, RD Thrush wrote:
>> On 09/12/13 05:15, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
>>> [...]
>>>
>>> Could you try the diff below on the v1 machine and tell me if it helps?
>>
>> Thanks, I don't think it helped...
> 
> By looking at your new log, I believe it did ;)
> 
>> After booting the new kernel, upon first use of the kvm switch, the serial
>> console began filling with diagnostics which (to my untrained eye) looked
>> similar to the pre-patch session. v1-2.  Since I was unable to remotely ssh, 
>> I
>> interrupted ddb and set ehcidebug=1 but was unable to remotely ssh.  
>> ehcidebug=0
>> allowed remote ssh and normal operations resumed.
>>
>> <http://arp.thrush.com/openbsd/ehci_idone/v1/v1-3> has the associated serial
>> console.
>>
>> Let me know if I can provide further info.
> 
> Could you reproduce once again this manipulation with the diff below
> applied on top of the previous one?

<http://arp.thrush.com/openbsd/ehci_idone/v1/v1-4> has the results after adding
your diff.

I'm assuming the continual diagnostic output is expected with ehcidebug=5.
Interrupting ddb, setting ehcidebug=1 and continuing ddb still hits my panic
hack; however, I'll assume that's due to the crudeness of my hack.  I did
subsequently reboot with the same custom kernel w/ ehcidebug=0 and didn't hit
the panic hack.

What's the next step?


>>>> WRT to the other machine, x4, I installed the patch and have not yet had a
>>>> problem.  However, with ehcidebug=5, the following 2 line message is issued
>>>> about once per second:
>>>> ehci_intrlist_timeout
>>>> ehci_check_intr: ex=0xffff800000238c00
>>>
>>> That's expected, thanks for confirming the problem cannot be reproduced
>>> with this diff with an ATI controller.
>>
>> Since the problem has been intermittent since Nov 2012, I'm not sure enough
>> time/kvm usage has occurred for certainty about that fix.
> 
> Since this diff is a backport of what has been done in FreeBSD and I
> already had a similar report from another developer with the same
> controller, I'm quite confident.
> 
>> I will run a custom MP kernel with your pci/ehci_pci.c patch on the x4 
>> machine
>> whenever I install a new snapshot and let you know if I notice the 
>> ehci_idone issue.
> 
> Please let me know.
> 
> Index: uhidev.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/dev/usb/uhidev.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.44
> diff -u -p -r1.44 uhidev.c
> --- uhidev.c  7 May 2013 08:44:38 -0000       1.44
> +++ uhidev.c  12 Sep 2013 14:25:52 -0000
> @@ -393,7 +393,7 @@ uhidev_intr(struct usbd_xfer *xfer, void
>       }
>  #endif
>  
> -     if (status == USBD_CANCELLED)
> +     if (status == USBD_CANCELLED || status == USBD_IOERROR)
>               return;
>  
>       if (status != USBD_NORMAL_COMPLETION) {

Reply via email to