On 8/26/13, Jonathan Gray <j...@jsg.id.au> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 12:35:18PM -0700, patrick keshishian wrote:
>> help?
>> should I wait for next snapshot?
>
> Some of the integrated graphics parts were previously disabled
> due to various issues. The radeondrm code we have now is a
> complete re-port though so try this:
Thanks for the reply. I'll give this a go as soon as I get
a breather.
Curious, the snapshot from Aug 17th worked "just fine".
I didn't scrutinize it too much then, but the X session seemed
fine to me, vs. the VESA one now that looks "just wrong".
Cheers,
--patrick
> Index: radeon_kms.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/dev/pci/drm/radeon/radeon_kms.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.3
> diff -u -p -r1.3 radeon_kms.c
> --- radeon_kms.c 16 Aug 2013 19:53:53 -0000 1.3
> +++ radeon_kms.c 27 Aug 2013 00:38:49 -0000
> @@ -345,7 +345,6 @@ const struct drm_pcidev radeondrm_pciidl
> CHIP_RS300|RADEON_IS_IGP},
> {PCI_VENDOR_ATI, PCI_PRODUCT_ATI_RADEON_IGP9100,
> CHIP_RS300|RADEON_IS_IGP|RADEON_IS_MOBILITY},
> -#if 0
> {PCI_VENDOR_ATI, PCI_PRODUCT_ATI_RADEON_RS480,
> CHIP_RS480|RADEON_IS_IGP|RADEON_IS_IGPGART},
> {PCI_VENDOR_ATI, PCI_PRODUCT_ATI_RADEON_RS480_B,
> @@ -354,14 +353,12 @@ const struct drm_pcidev radeondrm_pciidl
> CHIP_RS480|RADEON_IS_IGP|RADEON_IS_MOBILITY|RADEON_IS_IGPGART},
> {PCI_VENDOR_ATI, PCI_PRODUCT_ATI_RADEON_RS482_B,
> CHIP_RS480|RADEON_IS_IGP|RADEON_IS_MOBILITY|RADEON_IS_IGPGART},
> -#endif
> {PCI_VENDOR_ATI, PCI_PRODUCT_ATI_RADEON_RV280_PRO, CHIP_RV280},
> {PCI_VENDOR_ATI, PCI_PRODUCT_ATI_RADEON_RV280, CHIP_RV280},
> {PCI_VENDOR_ATI, PCI_PRODUCT_ATI_RADEON_RV280_B, CHIP_RV280},
> {PCI_VENDOR_ATI, PCI_PRODUCT_ATI_RADEON_RV280_SE_S, CHIP_RV280},
> {PCI_VENDOR_ATI, PCI_PRODUCT_ATI_FIREMV_2200, CHIP_RV280},
> {PCI_VENDOR_ATI, PCI_PRODUCT_ATI_ES1000, CHIP_RV100},
> -#if 0
> {PCI_VENDOR_ATI, PCI_PRODUCT_ATI_RADEON_RS400,
> CHIP_RS400|RADEON_IS_IGP|RADEON_IS_IGPGART},
> {PCI_VENDOR_ATI, PCI_PRODUCT_ATI_RADEON_RS400_B,
> @@ -370,7 +367,6 @@ const struct drm_pcidev radeondrm_pciidl
> CHIP_RS400|RADEON_IS_IGP|RADEON_IS_IGPGART},
> {PCI_VENDOR_ATI, PCI_PRODUCT_ATI_RADEON_RC410_B,
> CHIP_RS400|RADEON_IS_IGP|RADEON_IS_MOBILITY|RADEON_IS_IGPGART},
> -#endif
> {PCI_VENDOR_ATI, PCI_PRODUCT_ATI_RADEON_X300,
> CHIP_RV380|RADEON_NEW_MEMMAP},
> {PCI_VENDOR_ATI, PCI_PRODUCT_ATI_RADEON_X600_RV370,
> @@ -611,14 +607,12 @@ const struct drm_pcidev radeondrm_pciidl
> CHIP_RS300|RADEON_IS_IGP|RADEON_NEW_MEMMAP},
> {PCI_VENDOR_ATI, PCI_PRODUCT_ATI_RADEON_RS350IGP,
> CHIP_RS300|RADEON_IS_IGP|RADEON_IS_MOBILITY|RADEON_NEW_MEMMAP},
> -#if 0
> {PCI_VENDOR_ATI, PCI_PRODUCT_ATI_RADEON_X1250_1,
> CHIP_RS690|RADEON_IS_IGP|RADEON_NEW_MEMMAP|RADEON_IS_IGPGART},
> {PCI_VENDOR_ATI, PCI_PRODUCT_ATI_RADEON_X1250_2,
> CHIP_RS690|RADEON_IS_IGP|RADEON_NEW_MEMMAP|RADEON_IS_IGPGART},
> {PCI_VENDOR_ATI, PCI_PRODUCT_ATI_RADEON_X1250IGP,
> CHIP_RS690|RADEON_IS_IGP|RADEON_NEW_MEMMAP|RADEON_IS_IGPGART},
> -#endif
> {PCI_VENDOR_ATI, PCI_PRODUCT_ATI_FIREGL_V4000,
> CHIP_RV610|RADEON_NEW_MEMMAP},
> {PCI_VENDOR_ATI, PCI_PRODUCT_ATI_FIREMV_2260,
