On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 01:42:13PM +0200, J??r??mie Courr??ges-Anglas wrote: > > \- is afaik treated correctly in all the cases I described above, except > for a very small number of groff versions, when in an UTF-8 locale or > using ps/pdf (there you can get an unicode minus sign). This case was > quickly fixed. You can see lots of reports about all these problems on > the WWW. > > Now if you think \- is wrong for a command-line flag, a litteral "-" > argument, or inside a command name, tell this to Ingo, since that's what > is produced by a Fl inside mandoc. ;) >
yes, if you're correct, then we would want to convert "-" to "\-". i had no idea this was the case. where does it happen about? jmc
