Theo, Don't you just love it when folks ask questions they already know the answers to?
Still, FUSE is a wonderful idea. It certainly would make OpenBSD more versatile (and even allow it to wend its way further into both the user and corporate market segments. anyway, hope you are having a nice summer up there (its roasting here at or above 115). keep cool and don't let the buggers get you down. :) -Eric On Jul 3, 2013, at 5:55 PM, Theo de Raadt wrote: >> About a month ago, I followed up on tech@ that some fuse support had >> been merged into the kernel, but disable by default. >> (By the way, congrats and thanks to the devs for that! :D) >> >> I'm wondering if there's any timeframe for this getting enabled by default >> - I'd love to have fuse support, but I don't think I'm ready to void my >> warranty just yet ;) >> >> Is there more testing needed, or exactly what's necessary for it to >> move forward? >> >> On a somewhat related note; might this mean we might be able to port >> fuse drivers (like aufs) into BSD? :D > > Good grief. > > You can enable it yourself, right now. > > You can test it. You can find bugs. You can report them. You can > even try to fix them. You can communicate directly with developers > trying to bring it to fruition. > > Instead, what is your mail -- is it a rah rah please enable it > tomorrow? Is it a statement of "event if there is a major screw up > hiding, enable it tomorrow please please please rah rah rah?" > > Hugo, grow up. This is a participation community. The process is not > opaque. Opportunities for participation at all levels are highly > visible. Participate in development, to your own form. > > The email you sent above is not a form of participation. It is at > the level of "fanboy".
