On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 12:00:57PM -0430, Andres Perera wrote:
> dbus isn't big at all though, and it's even smaller when you consider
> that something else in your modern desktop env is going to end up
> depending on it
> 
> i'm curious about what gnome components you are talking about. dconf,
> again, is miniscule

Why do you assume that my desktop env is modern in sense of being D-Bus
enabled? Neither of its pillars - cwm, xterm, tmux and vim - has anything to
do with D-Bus.

My point is not about the _size_ of dependencies, but rather about their
_nature_. See, I don't use any features of D-Bus, as none of the apps I
installed uses it. (Well, my browser does something on D-Bus, but (1)
optionally and (2) there is nothing else connected.) I am not even aware of
any useful way to use D-Bus. Obviosly, I don't need it.

Same goes for dconf, as I keep all the settings I can out of dconf's touch,
just because I don't like it. To my knowledge, no dconf key is altered in my
setup, so I probably don't make any actual use of it anyway.

-- 
Dmitrij D. Czarkoff

Reply via email to