On 2013-02-20, Claudio Jeker <cje...@diehard.n-r-g.com> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 03:35:59PM +0300, Aaron Glenn wrote: >> I'm wondering if any one is thinking/contemplating/attempting >> implementing the newly release EIGRP draft from Cisco. >> No, I don't have patches to contribute...this is just a simple "anyone >> else thinking about this?" message. feel free to contact me privately >> if this is too noisy a message (hah...misc...noisy...heaven forbid)
interesting commentary at packetpushers if you missed it.. http://packetpushers.net/why-is-cisco-bothering-with-open-eigrp/ > Last time I looked EIGRP was a Cisco propretary protocol from the times > when RIP was modern. I see no need to support it, I would first consider > ISIS and adding stuff to ospfd / ospf6d. +1