On 2013-02-20, Claudio Jeker <cje...@diehard.n-r-g.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 03:35:59PM +0300, Aaron Glenn wrote:
>> I'm wondering if any one is thinking/contemplating/attempting
>> implementing the newly release EIGRP draft from Cisco.
>> No, I don't have patches to contribute...this is just a simple "anyone
>> else thinking about this?" message. feel free to contact me privately
>> if this is too noisy a message (hah...misc...noisy...heaven forbid)

interesting commentary at packetpushers if you missed it..

http://packetpushers.net/why-is-cisco-bothering-with-open-eigrp/

> Last time I looked EIGRP was a Cisco propretary protocol from the times
> when RIP was modern. I see no need to support it, I would first consider
> ISIS and adding stuff to ospfd / ospf6d.

+1

Reply via email to