On Friday, November 11, Karl Kopp wrote: > > We are in the process of setting up a production OBSD box to do some (a > lot!) of routing and I want to make sure I get as much redundancy as > possible. We have failover everything in the box, and we will use carp to > setup multiple boxes.
If you use carp to fail-over full boxes, why complicate and add to the potential failure modes of each box? Keep each box simple, and chances are it will keep running and be more reliable. --Toby.
