Am 21.09.2012 14:51, schrieb Stuart Henderson:
> CVE-2012-2979 isn't relevant as it's a non-standard
> build option that we don't use.
Good to know, thanks.
>> I have not found a patch for in 5.1 erratas so far.
> I've just committed a fix for CVE-2012-2978 to 5.1-stable,
> but I don't have time to handle issuing errata at the moment.
>
Yes, I just ran across your change, thank you Stuart to
putting this in -stable.

Let's hope the errata makes it to the page a little later -
one can still follow CVS by now. :-)

-- Mat

Reply via email to