Marc Espie: > > 36m17.68s real > > S 55m14.16s real > > I kind of wonder about similar data for full bulk builds.
That was my starting point, actually. I did a full bulk build with S and was startled by the slowdown. I forgot the exact numbers, but the relative difference was in the vicinity of the figures above. > Of course, I know a part of the answer: bulk with S will be shorter > than expected thanks to the fallout in large shit such as mono... Mono was the most significant breakage and that's fairly negligible overall. But I did end up with a tail end where libreoffice was the only port that was still building. Remind me to try this again during a slow part of the release cycle. -- Christian "naddy" Weisgerber na...@mips.inka.de
