On 11 August 2012 03:49, <benh...@gmx.us> wrote: > On 2012-08-11 03:21, Andres Perera wrote: >> >> i find it hard to believe you're involved in such project. "more >> portable", "more secure" don't mean anything unless details are >> involved. i mean, if it runs on your target hosts, what could "more >> portable" possibly mean? >> >> it's better to say: i'm trying out these two and i want a comparison. > > >> lying, saying your boss wants a bsd solution, doesn't make it seem >> more important! >> > I didn't expect to find a clairvoyant on this mailing list. > > Only, for the record: I said "client", not "boss"; I did not > say "I was involved", but that simply that "I was asked", > which is different; and I did candidly admit upfront that I > do not know much about BSDs, and that I was collecting > information; lastly, details *are*, of course, involved (as > with any project), but I simply did not feel the need to > mention them, since to me they seemed (and still seem) > irrelevant to the specific question I was asking. > > So, I really do not understand the rationale of you > accusing me of lying on the basis of one email > (incidentally, my very first email to this list). Above all, I > do not understand the aggressive tone... >
Well there are a lot of people in misc, in time you'll learn who to listen and who to ignore :/
