On Sat, Aug 04, 2012 at 05:47:47PM +0200, Janne Johansson wrote: > Also, diffs from git has proven to not apply cleanly at times (for > reasons unknown to me), so whatever you hope the versioning tool will > let you do, don't forget to make sure any contributions do apply.
Well, git just has a different set of bugs than cvs. Considering how many times "cvs import" has fucked up my tree and required hand-holding (gcc imports mostly), it's only a matter of "you know more about cvs than git"... I would deem cvs MORE painful than git on average, it's just that we're more accustomed to the pain...
