On Fri, 3 Aug 2012, Alexis de BRUYN wrote:

> Thanks Mats for your answer.
> 
> >> The chip is a DL-165. Maybe it is my problem. UDL(4) mentions that :
> >> DESCRIPTION
> >>      The udl driver supports USB display devices based on the DisplayLink
> >>      DL-120 / DL-160 graphic chip.
> > 
> > Nope, DL-165 is supported. But looking at udl.c i see that is seems to 
> > think that the device is a DL-160. I assume you are correct that your
> > device is based on DL-165. I have found more than one udl devices with
> > the same usb id, but different chipsets. The windows driver seems to have
> > a way of knowning which. 
> Yes I am sure, it is written here:
> http://www.startech.com/AV/USB-Video-Adapters/USB-DVI-External-Multi-Monitor-Video-Adapter~USB2DVI
> 
> > What you can test is changing the line in udl_devs for DISPLAYLINK_CONV 
> > from DL160 to DL165 and see if it makes any difference.
> I have changed to DL165 and rebuilt as you mentionned, but
> unfortunately, I have the same error message.

Hmm, looking at the message you get about modes it seems that they are
generated by dev/videomode/edid.c. Recompile it with EDIDVERBOSE defined.
That might give us more information on whats going on...

What kind of display is connected to the udl device?

-moj
 
> Regards,
> 
> -- 
> Alexis de BRUYN

Reply via email to