If the site is OK as it is, why add more fluff? Style sheets certainly
aren't
blotund like Jooma is, but why go there for the site? Guess I'm a
minimalist.
--STeve Andre'
On 06/26/12 21:52, Alvaro Mantilla Gimenez wrote:
Why is not possible to apply a new css style to the current site? That has
nothing to do with joomla (and similar) and would keep the site fast and
compatible with, let's say....lynx or whatever browser do you want to try with
the site.
I mean, for me the site is ok but a new css style could be a great thing too.
Same speed, same compatibility, new design.
- Alvaro
El 26/06/2012, a las 16:25, STeve Andre' escribió:
On 06/26/12 17:57, Pablo Velasco Fernández wrote:
I mean.. A modern style.
El 26/06/2012 23:55, "Miod Vallat" <m...@online.fr> escribió:
Hi. I was loolong the FreeBSD web page. And its a cool page with a cool
desing. Maybe OpenBSD should change their own page to a most "visual" web
page. ( Its only my opinion ) What do you think?
Last time I checked, you could use eyes to browse the OpenBSD website.
Why do you consider it non-visual?
Miod
OK, a modern style.
But why? Why is it that a web site that does what web sites should
do--convey information--have to be redesigned in order to keep up
with other sites? I see this all the time, at work where people seem
to think that things like Joomla<cough> are a good thing. I shouldn't
say just work, as I see it everywhere.
The OpenBSD site is simple and fast. I keep it in /usr/www which
consumes 291M as of today.
It's a great web site as it is.
--STeve Andre'
