On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 11:00 PM, Ted Unangst <t...@tedunangst.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 21:41, eagir...@cox.net wrote: > >> What may be a slightly faster method of tracking close to current: >> >> http://www.tedunangst.com/snapper.html >> >> I haven't used it in a while, because I used to build the kernel with NTFS >> support, and never got back to using it after that became part of GENERIC. > > I had a report that amd64 may not be working? i386 is, at least > assuming you catch a current snap. I've given up on trying to keep > pkgs up to date, though, it requires an insane amount of disk space. >
I used bluesnapper for amd64 twice today and worked just fine. Luis.
