On 1-3-2012 16:43, Hrvoje Popovski wrote: > On 28.2.2012. 14:23, Stuart Henderson wrote: >>> >>> There is no such option in ftp-proxy. >>> >>> What _might_ work is to run one ftp-proxy per IP (30 in your case) and >>> use "random" on the divert-to. >>> >>> <5 minutes later> >>> >>> I just tried it, and it does not work... divert-to does not support >>> random like rdr-to does. >>> >>> -- >>> Cam >>> >>> >> >> *not* tested but you could probably run a couple of ftp-proxy >> instances on different ports and use 'probability' rules to hit the >> right one. >> >> btw: that random stuff, at least without source-tracking, is >> likely to break bank websites etc. >> > > hello, > > i really don't know how to test camiel's suggestion. it's very likely > that i'm doing something very wrong. camiel could you post some config > just to guide me? i'm willing to test it and post results. > > stuart's suggestion is working. i'm aware that random stuff breaks > things and for that reason users are in other vlan with other nat.
I already said that my suggestion was not working. :-)
