On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 04:59:10PM +0100, LEVAI Daniel wrote: > On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 13:41:24 +1100, Jonathan Gray wrote: > [...] > > > > Can you try the following? It would be interesting to know why it doesn't > > match the class test. > > Of course, I'd be happy to. Sorry for the delay. > > > /bsd: class 0x2 subclass 0x2 protocol 0x0 > /bsd: umodem0 at uhub1 > /bsd: port 1 configuration 1 interface 0 "Atmel E85 USB Serial" rev > 2.00/1.00 addr 2 > /bsd: umodem0: data interface 1, has no CM over data, has no break > /bsd: umodem0: status change notification available > /bsd: ucom0 at umodem0
We don't want to match on a protocol of 0. I've committed something along the lines of the first diff.
