guys, it was so funny to see you biting each other.
come on, can you do it one more time, please ?

2012/1/23 Nico Kadel-Garcia <nka...@gmail.com>

> On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 5:38 PM, L. V. Lammert <l...@omnitec.net> wrote:
> > On Sun, 22 Jan 2012, Philip Guenther wrote:
> >
> > <snip the BS>
> >>
> > There is no way of knowing if it would have found the problem, so why
> > continue with this drivel? Contrary to the lengthy diatribes here trying
> > to distract from the original problem an solution:
> >
> > 1) The problem with locate was traced to a bunch of session files;
> > 2) The problem was fixed by cleaning them the hard way.
> >
> > There is no way to know if an upgrade would have fixed the problem, as
> > upgrading is/was/would be just a distraction; it is not good practice to
> > try and obscure the problem, and I do not understand why some people here
> > like to expouse such practices.
> >
> > Sure, there is no support for 4.3, but, then I did not ASK for support on
> > 4.3 (to read the OP). Don't bother to try and dixtract from the original
> > problem - it juse makes it harder for those LOOKING for the problem and
> > solution to find it in all the noise.
>
> As someone who's faced this kind of thing from both sides, I think
> you're going to have a long term problem with the "just help me fix
> the system I have, don't bother with telling me to upgrade" approach.
> Too many bugs are fixed as part of re-engineering or feature addition,
> and expecting even the authors, whom you are not paying for contracted
> work, to maintain the old releases becomes futile pretty quickly. It's
> difficult for them to maintain the old environments as test beds, or
> to dredge back that far into memory of how things used to be done.
> I've been running into this for decades, all the way back to the shift
> from BSD 4.2 to BSD 4.3. (Note that that is not OpenBSD, it's BSD.)
>
> The yelling and namecalling is unfortunate. But from observation and
> professional experience, if you want professional grade support for a
> software livecycle of over 3 years, you should be willing to pay for
> it.

Reply via email to