we hare 3 ISPs. and we are running haproxy (which is similar to relayd, proxies tcp connections from Internet to LAN).
so, with rdomains we need to a) run 3 instances of haproxy (route -T 2 exec /usr/local/sbin/haproxy, and so on) b) all of haproxy will access LAN, which can belong to just one rdomain our situation is very tricky with rdomains. however, we are looking with interest at rdomains and will probably use for some other applications. 2011/12/23 Claudio Jeker <cje...@diehard.n-r-g.com>: > On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 01:17:10PM +0500, ???? ??????? wrote: >> thank everyone. >> >> routing domains seem to be much more powerful than I need. >> I just needed outgoing packets through the appropriate interface, it >> can be achived by "reply-to" thing in PF. >> > > You can also use a simple additional routing table. > > route -T 1 add default X.Y.Z.1 > > this way the routing table will use routing table 0 to find the gateway > (all interfaces are in the default rdomain 0) and pf will just tag the > packets to use the other table for route lookups (adding rtable 1 to rules > will send all traffic to X.Y.Z.1 for forwarding). > > For simple things route-to/reply-to is maybe easier to setup. > > -- > :wq Claudio
