mike, might have to tweak hardmtu in attach too. maybe.
dlg On 23/10/2011, at 6:18 AM, Mike Belopuhov wrote: > On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 20:14 +0200, Maxim Bourmistrov wrote: >> >> On both sides I use em(4) with MTU 9000. >> Then tried to set the same value to the pfsync with success (ifconfig pfsync0 mtu 9000), but the actual value I see is 2048. >> > > ugh. i thought you've fixed up the source code. > i'm curious if it'll still work with a smaller mtu on the physical > interface :-) > > Index: net/if_pfsync.c > =================================================================== > RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/net/if_pfsync.c,v > retrieving revision 1.169 > diff -u -p -r1.169 if_pfsync.c > --- net/if_pfsync.c 20 Oct 2011 08:57:26 -0000 1.169 > +++ net/if_pfsync.c 22 Oct 2011 18:17:44 -0000 > @@ -1294,8 +1294,8 @@ pfsyncioctl(struct ifnet *ifp, u_long cm > s = splnet(); > if (ifr->ifr_mtu <= PFSYNC_MINPKT) > return (EINVAL); > - if (ifr->ifr_mtu > MCLBYTES) /* XXX could be bigger */ > - ifr->ifr_mtu = MCLBYTES; > + if (ifr->ifr_mtu > 65536) > + ifr->ifr_mtu = 65536; > if (ifr->ifr_mtu < ifp->if_mtu) > pfsync_sendout(); > ifp->if_mtu = ifr->ifr_mtu;
