On 20 September 2011 14:08, Corey <clinge...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 09/19/2011 08:04 PM, Joel Wiramu Pauling wrote: > >> If you are Going to use linux as your dom0 I STRONGLY recommend against >> virtual box. Vb is the retarded stillborn twin of kvm. Kvm is twice as >> fast >> in mainline and not controlled by oracle >> >> sent from android handset. Please mind the brevity. >> On Sep 20, 2011 12:44 AM, "Nico Kadel-Garcia"<nka...@gmail.com**> wrote: >> >> Maybe so, but it works fine for me in a workstation environment. Many > things work better than in KVM (video, USB passthrough) and I don't see any > perceptible speed difference. KVM does seem to use less CPU, and that usage > is better balanced amongst cores, than with VirtualBox. I think KVM is > closing the gap, and am prepared for Oracle to drop VBox entirely if it > suits Ellison's whims. > > I wouldn't use VirtualBox in a server environment, but then again I don't > get the feeling that that is its target environment
This is off topic now, but seriously, I use both (Virtualbox has one advantage in that it can host Solaris10 properly). And VB has NO advantages, all of the advantages are to KVM. As for Video use Spice enabled KVM, and USB pass through has been present for yonks. > > C
