On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 4:27 PM, frantisek holop <min...@obiit.org> wrote: > hmm, on Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 06:20:13PM -0400, Ted Unangst said that >> On Tue, Aug 30, 2011, frantisek holop wrote: >> >> > >> > it's not like there are no reasonable alternatives. nginx for example >> > has a nice security record and a 2 clause bsd license. but as it's in >> > the ports i personally dont care if it's in base or ports. sendmail and >> > apache are really the only things in openbsd base that baffle me >> > everytime i cross paths with them. they represent everything the >> > openbsd philosophy refuses. >> >> They represent the backwards compatible and don't go chasing the newest >> thing because it's new parts of the philosophy. That doesn't mean the >> same choices to include them would be made today, but the decision isn't >> being made today either. > > choices are being made every day :] > > plenty of examples in openbsd for much more radical changes, > openbsd is certainly not in the category of the faint hearted. > (ripping out a whole firewall anyone?) > > now this is not about me pushing e.g. nginx as an apache > replacement in base. before these very usable alternatives > i was quite happy to have a reliable web server in base, > just like anyone else. but for me it's really time to move on.
so which linux distro are you moving to?
