Hello all, For I, differences are simple : OpenBSD : all products included are stable & working fully from the install sets & packages. OpenBSD : just install necessary things. Ubuntu : All products are allowd to the dist, even unstable Ubuntu : installs many many things as a workstation use even on server version of ubuntu
Ubuntu is a good choice too, but it has a "workstation-like" setup, +server functions, so it can use many ram and many cpu. OpenBSD : just need an bi-annual upgrade, version to version, & gets light charge on server itself. I prefer having OpenBSD to all servers but application server. I prefer having Linux to applications server to use GUI-applications-manager/monitor. > ---------------------------------------- > From: Juan Miscaro <jmisc...@gmail.com> > Sent: Thu Jul 07 15:02:08 CEST 2011 > To: openbsd-misc <misc@openbsd.org> > Subject: How does OpenBSD compare to Ubuntu Server? > > > Was wondering what advantages OpenBSD has over a progressive Linux > distribution such as Ubuntu (Server edition). One thing I noticed is > that they're having a hell of a time transitioning away from the > traditional sysvinit-based system to the Upstart event-based init > daemon system. > > -- > /jm > Cordialement Francois Pussault 3701 - 8 rue Marcel Pagnol 31100 ToulouseB FranceB +33 6 17 230 820 B +33 5 34 365 269 fpussa...@contactoffice.fr
