On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 10:07:47AM -0600, Ken Gunderson wrote: > On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 14:06:11 +0100 > "Constantine A. Murenin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 19/10/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > There is a legitimate use for top posting. > > > Deletion and/or answer of message in 10 to 15 seconds or less. > > > > Nonsense. Just because your MS Outlook does not support or is not > > configured to support bottom-posting, doesn't mean that you should > > find some invalid excuses for top-posting. > > With a sig like mine I coudln't resist a resounding "me too" on this > one;-) My sig concisely demonstrates in a nutshell why top posting is > problematic, if not an all out pita.
FWIW, there's a little program called QuoteFix that will make Outlook quote the email you're replying to and put the cursor and sig underneath. Works for me when I'm at work. bc -- Benjamin Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 'Broadly speaking, the short words are the best, and the old words best of all.' --- Sir Winston Churchill [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature]
