It was well said that when we learn lisp we all start thinking things like that. ;) As to what theo said about interfaces, of course it is correct, but on the other hand (as a design tool) doesn't Hal Abelman on the SICP lectures say, that it is a powerfull techinique to be able to create interfaces that you forget everything about them afterwards? He goes on to demonstrate...
In my mind the thing boils down to this: in the PC as it is structured (HW-wise) you can't impose functional programming (at least in an elegant/meaningfull way). But if you consider as specially built arch for executing LISP code as the Connection Machine (from thinking machines) then it could get interesting ;) and yes sorry for talking and not working on clisp :( DsP On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 6:38 AM, Super Biscuit <super_bisq...@yahoo.com> wrote: > I know neither C(++), or LISP, or PERL, or python or any other language. > > I've worked on VirtualBox porting to FreeBSD. > I am working on GNOME3 on FreeBSD for ppc and sparc64 in my spare time. > > No lisp, no c, no other language . This is just from being able to read and > understand code. > > I know how far emacspeak can be compiled on OpenBSD PPC and what is needed. > > Many people can do what I do; but, I don't consider them a "waste of mind" as > you do. > Your head is so far up your ass that you have a ring of shit for a necklace. > > > > > > > --- On Wed, 6/8/11, Thomas de Grivel <billi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > From: Thomas de Grivel <billi...@gmail.com> > Subject: Re: OT: Re: Seems OpenBSD isn't absolutely alone in it's quest, > atleast on embedded systems. > To: "misc@openbsd.org" <misc@openbsd.org> > Date: Wednesday, June 8, 2011, 10:23 AM > > [Other shit removed to concentrate on the ignorance of the last line.] > > Any hacker not knowing a couple of Lisp macros is a waste of mind. > > -- Thomas de Grivel > > "I must plunge into the water of doubt again and again."