It was well said that when we learn lisp we all start thinking things
like that. ;)
As to what theo said about interfaces, of course it is correct, but on the other
hand (as a design tool) doesn't Hal Abelman on the SICP lectures say,
that it is
a powerfull techinique to be able to create interfaces that you forget
everything
about them afterwards? He goes on to demonstrate...

In my mind the thing boils down to this:
in the PC as it is structured (HW-wise) you can't impose functional programming
(at least in an elegant/meaningfull way). But if you consider as specially built
arch for executing LISP code as the Connection Machine (from thinking machines)
then it could get interesting ;)

and yes sorry for talking and not working on clisp :(

DsP

On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 6:38 AM, Super Biscuit <super_bisq...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> I know neither C(++), or LISP, or PERL, or python or any other language.
>
> I've worked on VirtualBox porting to FreeBSD.
> I am working on GNOME3 on FreeBSD for ppc and sparc64 in my spare time.
>
> No lisp, no c, no other language . This is just from being able to read and 
> understand code.
>
> I know how far emacspeak can be compiled on OpenBSD PPC and what is needed.
>
> Many people can do what I do; but, I don't consider them a "waste of mind" as 
> you do.
> Your head is so far up your ass that you have a ring of shit for a necklace.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --- On Wed, 6/8/11, Thomas de Grivel <billi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> From: Thomas de Grivel <billi...@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: OT: Re: Seems OpenBSD isn't absolutely alone in it's quest, 
> atleast on embedded systems.
> To: "misc@openbsd.org" <misc@openbsd.org>
> Date: Wednesday, June 8, 2011, 10:23 AM
>
> [Other shit removed to concentrate on the ignorance of the last line.]
>
> Any hacker not knowing a couple of Lisp macros is a waste of mind.
>
> -- Thomas de Grivel
>
> "I must plunge into the water of doubt again and again."

Reply via email to