hmm, on Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 01:00:46PM +0000, Kevin Chadwick said that
> "mksh is the only pdksh derivate currently being actively developed. It
> includes bug fixes and feature improvements, in order to produce a
> modern, robust shell good for interactive and especially script
> use. mksh has UTF-8 support (in substring operations and the Emacs
> editing mode) and, while R39c corresponds to OpenBSD 4.6-current ksh
> (without GNU bash-like PS1 and fancy character classes), adheres to
> SUSv4 and is much more robust."
how can it be the only "actively developed one" when it was forked
from openbsd's ksh? is openbsd not being actively developed anymore?
on every debian i have to use, 'sudo apt-get install pdksh' is the first
thing i do, the second being 'scp {.profile,.kshrc} debian:'
-f
--
how much can i get away with and still go to heaven?
