W dniu 2011-02-22 18:31, Fridiric URBAN pisze:
Hello,
We kinda have the same setup, but with bnx(4) devices. And there is no
problem. I'm used to download big files on FTP all over the world and we
have gigabit connectivity without any pf related tuning. We are planning
to use em(4) 82876 on another path to another ISP so if you find
anything else, i'm very interested.
Bonne soirie ;)
Le 22/02/2011 18:19, Mark Nipper a icrit :
On 22 Feb 2011, Patrick Lamaiziere wrote:
The problem is that we don't get more than ~320 Mbits/s of bandwith
beetween the internal networks and internet (gigabit).
Have you already looked at:
---
https://calomel.org/network_performance.html
Hello,
i have been writing to this group about the same problem on November
2010 -> http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=128990880310013&w=2
After some discussion, Claudio Joker suggested, that there might be
problem with TBR (token bucket regulator).
When I tried to set tbrsize in pf.conf like man says a got an error.
altq on em0 cbq bandwidth 1Gb tbrsize 4K queue { q_lan }
queue q_lan bandwidth 950Mb cbq (default)
i got error:
root@router-test (/root)# pfctl -f /etc/pf.conf
/etc/pf.conf:9: syntax error
/etc/pf.conf:10: queue q_lan has no parent
/etc/pf.conf:10: errors in queue definition
pfctl: Syntax error in config file: pf rules not loaded
without tbrsize altq definition is ok.
Problem exist for Broadcom cards (bge) also but developers don't have
enough time to look into it deeper unfortunately.
best regards,
RLW
