Neat now OpenBSD and I share the same birthday :-)
On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 09:11:00AM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> Mickey's calendar is not telling the truth.
>
> There problem is there are a few things which happened in the days
> beforehands (13th, 14th, 17th) as the decision to setup a repository
> started being taken. It took a few days to get things imported just
> right. Machines were slow back in those days, too.
>
> There are teeny artifacts of those attempts, for instance in
> ChangeLog.1 you can see the import attempts (I think on the 13th cvs
> was crashing because of some large files in the repository).
>
> The repository we use today is marked Oct 18, 1995 throughout, as
> the 1.1 revision is many files. Many other things are that way too.
>
> For a project so large, how else should we date it. First time I used
> the name OpenBSD? Date the DNS record was allocated? Date web page went
> up? Date other developers got accounts? Or should we set the date based
> on some previous conversation with the NetBSD guys?
>
> So, with that said,
>
> CVSROOT: /cvs
> Module name: src
> Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005/10/14 09:06:10
>
> Modified files:
> usr.bin/calendar/calendars: calendar.openbsd
>
> Log message:
> assume niklas's dating for openbsd birth
>
>
> CVSROOT: /cvs
> Module name: src
> Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005/10/14 09:09:25
>
> Modified files:
> usr.bin/calendar/calendars: calendar.openbsd
>
> Log message:
> doh! it was a wednesday. and fix the time as well then
>
>
> And that is:
>
> Oct 18 OpenBSD born, Wednesday 08:37:01 GMT, 1995
>
>
> It's more important that we agree ;)
