> I don't read all posts either so I don't fault you. I am one of the > ones that said the site *is* in fact broken compared to the new design > when you look at it with Lynx. When I am setting up a server (no gui) > I use lynx to do my downloads. A web site based on the new design would > be an improvment. Check it out for yourself.
The design of a web page has nothing to do with its accessibility via lynx. Accessibility is a matter of source code structure and quality. No matter what the web page looks like in a graphical browser, you can optimize the source code to make it better accessible for people who use lynx or other programs which mainly display the textual contents of a html document in the order presented there. Take a look at http://www.w3.org/WAI/ IMHO a redesign should use XHTML/CSS. Otherwise it would be hard to realize proper accessibility for lynx :-) I agree with Stuart, contents and navigation should be seperated. Matthias > > --ja > > On Wed, 14 Sep 2005, Spruell, Darren-Perot wrote: > >> From: Stuart Henderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > --On 14 September 2005 17:54 +0400, slack _usr wrote: >> > > I agree with that. Such structure is much better than current one. >> > >> > homepage layout != website structure >> >> Agreed. And current website != broken, either. As was said before, >> let's forego trying to "fix" something which works perfectly well as >> it is, just because of someone's petty preferences on style. >> >> DS >> >> > > --
