hi there, is there a reason /bsd must be executable? is there a reason /bsd must be not executable?
config -e -o writes an executable one. so is that the way it should be? -f -- it's my idea 'cause i stole it first!
hi there, is there a reason /bsd must be executable? is there a reason /bsd must be not executable?
config -e -o writes an executable one. so is that the way it should be? -f -- it's my idea 'cause i stole it first!