Hannah Schroeter wrote: > Hello! > > On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 09:30:51AM +0200, Ramiro Aceves wrote: > >>[...] > > >>Thank you very much to all for your responses. I seems that It is a good >>time to learn the C++ thing. Some time ago with no too much free time, I >>tried it with no luck. I found object oriented programming very strange. > > > I found "upgrading" much of my C... programming to C++ instead of C > proper quite worthwhile. A good thing is, C++ doesn't force you into > full OO as much as Java, Eiffel, or similar.
I understand... > > You can use C++ as slightly enhanced C (even though some C++ people > might cringe at that idea), you can use it to do OO stuff, you can > do some generic programming, and you can combine things as they feel > fit. Some problem domains fit OO better than others, so you always can > make a different choice. > > >>Anyway, It seems that if I want to make NEC compile under OpenBSD, I >>will have to do some hard work ;-) I think it will be a good and >>interesting programming experience. > > > Of course you could also suggest changes (patches) to OpenBSD to > support enough of C99 to make that NEC thing compile with less changes > to that. Oh, I would like to do it, but I am an horrible programmer. I only do very easy and simple programs for my personal use (amateur radio and engineering calculations). Very easy things like entering numbers, making calculations, and output the results. :-( Thank you very much, Ramiro. > > Though, I find it quite premature, on the side of software authors, to > except C99 support with no fallback. > > >>[...] > > > Kind regards, > > Hannah.
