Well

This is an output from a dmesg that is not mine. But the error looks exactly
like this and say "Warning, unable to fix up PCI interrupt routing":

pcibios0 at bios0: rev 2.1 @ 0xf7000/0xf80
pcibios0: PCI IRQ Routing Table rev 1.0 @ 0xf5210/128 (6 entries)
pcibios0: PCI IRQ Routing Table rev 1.0 @ 0xf78d0/128 (6 entries)
pcibios0: no compatible PCI ICU found: ICU vendor 0xffff product 0xffff
pcibios0: Warning, unable to fix up PCI interrupt routing
pcibios0: PCI bus #2 is the last bus

But the server seems to work as OpenBSD always do... Like a charm ;-)

Why does the server work?
What is the drawback to use it?
Can I do anything to fix it?


If the info above is not enough to give a statement I will post a dmesg as
soon as I can reach the server.

Thanks in advance
/Per-Olov

--
GPG keyID: 4DB283CE
GPG fingerprint: 45E8 3D0E DE05 B714 D549 45BC CFB4 BBE9 4DB2 83CE

On Wednesday 13 July 2005 21.49, Per-Olov Sjvholm wrote:
> You're right!
>
> I will fix it as soon as possible and add it to the post.
>
> Shouldn't have posted without it...
>
> /Per-Olov
> --
> GPG keyID: 4DB283CE
> GPG fingerprint: 45E8 3D0E DE05 B714 D549 45BC CFB4 BBE9 4DB2 83CE
>
> On Wednesday 13 July 2005 21.36, Marco Peereboom wrote:
> > You really need to include the whole dmesg if you want someone to give
> > you a useful answer.
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 13, 2005 at 09:33:45PM +0200, Per-Olov Sjvholm wrote:
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > I have a server that shows this from the dmesg:
> > > pcibios0 at bios0: rev 2.1 @ 0xf0000/0x10000
> > > pcibios0: PCI IRQ Routing Table rev 1.0 @ 0xfeae0/160 (8 entries)
> > > pcibios0: PCI Interrupt Router at 000:31:0 ("Intel 82801EB/ER LPC" rev
> > > 0x00) pcibios0: PCI bus #2 is the last bus
> > >
> > > But I also have a server that shows error (don't have the server
> > > available) with PCI IRQ Routing when starting the OpenBSD 3.7
> > > installation. Running a dmesg after install shows the same PCI
> > > interrupt error when loading pcibios0: . But the server works OK.
> > >
> > > Why does the server work?
> > > What is the drawback to use it?
> > > What can I do?
> > >
> > > Thanks in advance
> > > Per-Olov
> > > --
> > > GPG keyID: 4DB283CE
> > > GPG fingerprint: 45E8 3D0E DE05 B714 D549 45BC CFB4 BBE9 4DB2 83CE
> > >
> > > [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature]
>
> [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature]

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature]

Reply via email to