On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 03:26:40PM -0500, Dave Beckstrom wrote: > Greg, > > I believe the problem has already been solved thanks to some help from a > gentleman who sent me some information privately. > > I won't know for certain for a day or two but I am optimistic. > > I want to thank the people who responded with some suggestions for debugging > and things to try. > > I'm going to unsubscribe from the list now. > > Nobody was able to tell me how to replace the functionality of the > > " */10 * * * * /usr/libexec/atrun" > > line in my cron file. I had read the man pages regarding "at" before I > asked the question but I didn't fully understand how "at" might replace > atrun. So if someone cares to help on that last question please shoot me a > private email. > > Have a great day everyone.
Did "at" jobs stop working without that line? No, 'cause the atrun functionnality was merged into cron since OpenBSD 3.2. Welcome to 2002. -- Hugo Villeneuve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://EINTR.net/
