Just to guess. In most of the article Linux was being criticized from a code standpoint, both in the design and the system they use to develop.
On 6/17/05, Abraham Al-Saleh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm actually curious as to the apparent change of stance between > interviews. > In the last two interviews I've read, you've made it clear that you've > never > used it, and had no comment. Am I missing something? Just curious. > > On 6/17/05, Theo de Raadt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 04:48:31PM +0200, J. Lievisse Adriaanse wrote: > > > > Theo gave an interview to Forbes Magazine, in which he stated: "It's > > > > terrible," De Raadt says. "Everyone is using it, and they don't > > > > realize how bad it is. And the Linux people will just stick with it > > > > and add to it rather than stepping back and saying, 'This is garbage > > > > and we should fix it.'" > > > > > > Heh. Theo never did pull his punches. I suppose there's now a war > going > > > on in /. ? :) > > > > If the Linux people actually cared about Quality, as we do, they would > > not have had as many localhost kernel security holes in the last year. > > > > How many is it... 20 so far? > > > > > > > -- > Abe Al-Saleh > And then came the Apocolypse. It actually wasn't that > bad, everyone got the day off and there were barbeques > all around.
