On Wed, 15 Jun 2005, Varun Dubey wrote: > Thanks for the reply. I went through the thread but i believe the problem > i am facing is not exactly due to no support for unionfs.
you misunderstand. the reason union was removed is because it didn't work. removing it didn't break it, it was removed because it was broken. mount_union doesn't work? yes, we know. -- And that's why I'm late getting here.
