Why is RAIDFrame not in the generic kernel? Is it too big, or buggy?
On 6/11/05, Jens Teglhus Mxller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Marco Peereboom on 2005-06-11 17:20:28 -0500:
> >
> >> but you are not supposed to.
> >
> > raidctl(8) gives an example of how to set up root or RAID with
> > RAIDFrame and does not discourage the reader from doing so.
> >
> > "At this time, RAID 0, 1, 4, and 5 sets are all supported as root
> > devices."
>
> I've succesfully set up raidframe (raid 1 i think) on root once, but
> would advice against it, since it makes upgrading a little difficult,
> since raidframe is not in generic, but it can be done (i did it back
> in the 3.1 days).
>
> /jtm
>
> >> On Jun 11, 2005, at 4:47 PM, Alec Berryman wrote:
> >>
> >> >Rob Foster on 2005-06-11 16:49:09 -0400:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >>I've been searching google if the OpenBSD kernel can boot off
> >> >>CCD. Is
> >> >>this supported?
> >> >>
> >> >>My requirements for setting up any new servers are that they have
> >> >>fault tolerant disks. In this case, there is no option for
> >> >>hardware
> >> >>RAID because it's a blade. Can OpenBSD boot off RAIDFrame?
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >I can't speak for CCD, but I have successfully booted OpenBSD off
> >> >RAIDFrame in a RAID1 configuration.
