Rod Whitworth said: > You really believe those UW people really can consider something unsafe > before they clean up their own exploit history?
How exactly would they clean their history by doing anything but not repeating it? > falling! I don't know about many IMAP servers but I know that UW-IMAP > is considered less than favourably in many circles. So is Sendmail. In fact, in many circles, using Sendmail is considered tantamount to leaving your server wide open: should we believe what's held to be true "in many circles"? > I don't use courier but: > http://www.courier-mta.org/mbox-vs-maildir/ might make you think again. > At least it is based on experiments where all the processes and > environments are defined. Newsflash: author of MBX-based IMAP server favors MBX; author of Maildir-based IMAP server favors Maildir. Both prefer beating on how horrible mbox is over discussing each other. Other benchmarks seem to suggest that depending on your filesystem, Maildir might be better... or it might not be. -- Matthew Weigel hacker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
