On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 11:57 AM, Daniel van Vugt
<daniel.van.v...@canonical.com> wrote:
Not impossible, but it feels too ugly. I would prefer to keep reports
for debugging/logging only where they don't affect the behavior of
the server. And programmers can assume this is true without knowing
the implementation details of any given subsystem.
I agree, but
The implementation is potentially also ugly. At each point where a
report happens you can't any more say:
report_interface->report_something()
because that would only call one implementation. So we would need to
change the architecture of all reports and for consistency change
them all. It doesn't sound nice.
...this wouldn't actually be true? We'd just make
the_report_interface() not an override point and instead always have
the same implementation (which would then delegate to whichever report
implementations have been registered).
--
Mir-devel mailing list
Mir-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/mir-devel
