On 07/07/16 05:45, Christopher James Halse Rogers wrote: > Seems sensible; should this become necessary again we're very nearly > in a position to accommodate it as a no-core-changes-needed platform > anyway.
+1 > > On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 11:40 PM, Kevin DuBois > <kevin.dub...@canonical.com> wrote: >> Sounds good to me, screencasting seems to have become the preferred >> way that capturing output. >> --Kevin >> >> On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 5:24 AM, Alexandros Frantzis >> <alexandros.frant...@canonical.com> wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> for a few years now, Mir has provided the --offscreen option to render >>> to offscreen buffers instead of the real outputs (note that it still >>> needs proper GPU/GLESv2 support, and it doesn't work in all >>> environments). This option was implemented experimentally in order to >>> help with automated QA scenarios, but it was never adopted, and we >>> didn't get any feedback or improvement requests. >>> >>> Unless someone is currently using --offscreen, or has a valid use case >>> for it, I would like to remove it from our code base. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Alexandros >>> >>> -- >>> Mir-devel mailing list >>> Mir-devel@lists.ubuntu.com >>> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: >>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/mir-devel >> > > -- Mir-devel mailing list Mir-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/mir-devel
