For mobile it totally makes sense.

For desktop I think you will find people will want to run "unsigned/untrusted" "legacy" apps quite a lot :)


On 18/09/15 15:13, Michał Sawicz wrote:
W dniu 18.09.2015 o 09:05, Daniel van Vugt pisze:
Sounds like an improvement, thanks. In the long term though, I think you
will find power users (and even some apps) want to launch non-Qt apps by
simply executing them. Eventually (as with any other desktop OS) they
will need to /just work/. So any wrapper will need to go away.

It's not about Qt or not. The shell requires to uniquely and reliably
identify a client. I can't see a way for this to happen securely without
a trusted third-party (today that's ubuntu-app-launch, it might be
apparmor).
Apps aren't able to directly launch other apps, they have to request an
app to be launched (generally via opening a URL), it's the user that
will ultimately decide whether they allow that or not.

Those are all security features that we might allow "power users" to
lift via a setting or similar, but will be the default behaviour for the
foreseeable future.


--
Mir-devel mailing list
Mir-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/mir-devel

Reply via email to