I tend to agree, although i am curious to hear what others think. My hope would be that we'd be balanced about adopting "new language variants and dependencies" - if we have reasons to do so, then do those outweigh stagnating for the sake of being able to build on older ubuntu stables?
br,kg On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 10:35 PM, Daniel van Vugt < daniel.van.v...@canonical.com> wrote: > All, > > In the past we've made decisions to adopt new language variants and > dependencies for Mir that meant only users on the latest Ubuntu release > could build the latest Mir code. And if the latest Ubuntu release means the > pre-release then we're probably excluding most Ubuntu users from being able > to build the Mir code and getting involved. > > In early development that's fine, but I'm wondering if we can agree to aim > for some solidification. For example, should we say that after Ubuntu 16.04 > LTS is released all Ubuntu releases thereafter should be usable for doing > development on Mir? Or just the latest LTS plus the latest release (ie. > follow the Ubuntu support schedule)? > > - Daniel > > -- > Mir-devel mailing list > Mir-devel@lists.ubuntu.com > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/mir-devel >
-- Mir-devel mailing list Mir-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/mir-devel
