On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 1:12 AM, Gerry Boland <gerry.bol...@canonical.com> wrote:
> This was option 1 in the original email, and disliked greatly by Thomi. > It requires AP punching open appArmor rules between clients & unity8 > when running tests. DBus has much greater latency. Also would require > notion of surface ID, which Mir folks also dislike. > It'd also require one extra dbus call at a _minimum_ for every call to Mouse.click_object & Touch.tap_object (those names are from memory, might not be 100% accurate). While Dbus is fast, it's not fast enough to allow us to do this without noticing the impact. If we can avoid it, I'd rather we not rely on dbus for this. Cheers, -- Thomi Richards thomi.richa...@canonical.com
-- Mir-devel mailing list Mir-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/mir-devel
