On Sun, Aug 25, 2024 at 7:20 AM Neal Gompa <ngomp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Aug 11, 2024 at 7:04 PM Albert Astals Cid <aa...@kde.org> wrote:
> >
> > How hard would be for mingw64-boost/mingw32-boost to include
> > BoostConfig.cmake?
> >
> > boost-devel does but it's on the wrong "sysroot".
> >
>
> It shouldn't be hard, currently we're deleting the files instead of
> keeping them. I'm not sure if the files are usable, but if you're
> willing to test a build, I can attempt to restore them and provide a
> test build for you to try?
>

For reference, it looks like it was disabled ten years ago with this message:

* Fri Feb 10 2012 Erik van Pienbroek <epien...@fedoraproject.org> - 1.48.0-3
- Don't provide the cmake files any more as they are broken and cmake
itself already provides its own boost detection mechanism.
Should fix detection of boost by mingw32-qpid-cpp. RHBZ #597020, RHBZ #789399

Those bugs are:

* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/597020
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/789399

If CMake has its own way to detect Boost that works for this, is there
a reason you're not using it?



-- 
真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!
-- 
_______________________________________________
mingw mailing list -- mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to mingw-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to