On Tue, May 03, 2022 at 04:46:34PM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote: > > >>Any comments/objections? > >> > >> > >>That seems to make sense to me, is there a reason why it wasn't before? > >> > As far as I see mingw-filesystem provided the standard DLLs since > the beginning of the package, perhaps @rjones can recall if there > was a reason?
The reason for having the standard provides at all, or the reason they are in mingw-filesystem? The reason for having them at all is just for uniformity. You can "BuildRequires: mingw(wsock32.dll)" and not care whether that comes from Windows/Wine or from Fedora. The reason they are in mingw-filesystem and not in mingw-crt is likely just because we put them there without thinking about it too much. (Or "filesystem" is the system environment). Anyway moving them seem sensible, I have no objections. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com virt-builder quickly builds VMs from scratch http://libguestfs.org/virt-builder.1.html _______________________________________________ mingw mailing list -- mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to mingw-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
