https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858067
Sandro Mani <manisan...@gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC| |manisan...@gmail.com
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org |manisan...@gmail.com
Flags| |fedora-review?
--- Comment #5 from Sandro Mani <manisan...@gmail.com> ---
$ rpmlint mingw32-qt5-qtimageformats-5.0.2-1.fc20.noarch.rpm
mingw32-qt5-qtimageformats.noarch: W: no-documentation
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
$ rpmlint mingw64-qt5-qtimageformats-5.0.2-1.fc20.noarch.rpm
mingw64-qt5-qtimageformats.noarch: W: no-documentation
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
$ rpmlint mingw-qt5-qtimageformats-5.0.2-1.fc20.src.rpm
mingw-qt5-qtimageformats.src:26: W: macro-in-comment %{qt_module}
mingw-qt5-qtimageformats.src:26: W: macro-in-comment %{snapshot_rev}
mingw-qt5-qtimageformats.src:26: W: macro-in-comment %{qt_module}
mingw-qt5-qtimageformats.src:26: W: macro-in-comment %{snapshot_rev}
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings.
MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
Apart from that issue, everything is okay.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=kwTDAXGINo&a=cc_unsubscribe
_______________________________________________
mingw mailing list
mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mingw
