Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=604702 --- Comment #7 from Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl> 2011-06-02 07:44:56 EDT --- @Kalev, comment 3: I have a mingw-libjpeg-turbo package ready, but it's already based on the new guidelines (with win64 support). I could put it up for review, but it won't build successfully at the moment because the mingw-w64 toolchain isn't approved in Fedora yet @Levente, comment 4: It's strange that you encountered an API/ABI difference between libjpeg and libjpeg-turbo. When libjpeg-turbo was introduced in Fedora 14 no rebuilds were necessary at all as can be seen at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/libjpeg-turbo @Kalev, comment 5: That was also the plan I was having with the mingw-libjpeg-turbo package once the mingw-w64 toolchain gets approved for inclusion in Fedora. A mass rebuild will be required at that time anyway @Levente, comment 6: The patch mentioned in comment 1 only applies to libtiff. It isn't supposed to work in libjpeg. All packages using libjpeg would have to apply a variant to this patch as it all depends on the headers which get included in c/c++ files which want to use libjpeg headers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ mingw mailing list mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mingw
